There's a peculiar barrier in the satellite business: The people with money to invest or insure often can't read the data that tells them whether their bet is any good. Orbital mechanics isn't taught in business school. Two-line element sets don't translate neatly into risk metrics. For years, that's meant insurance underwriters and equity analysts have needed an aerospace engineer on speed dial just to figure out if a satellite might crash.
Kayhan Space thinks it has a fix. The Colorado company just released Satcat Terminal, a natural-language interface that lets non-technical users ask questions about orbital traffic the way they might query a stock price. Type "Which satellites are at risk of collision this week?" and the system answers—no physics degree required.
It's an unsubtle pitch. Kayhan itself calls the product a "Bloomberg Terminal-style experience" for space. Whether that comparison holds up will depend on whether the financial professionals the company is courting find the tool indispensable enough to pay for it. But the ambition is clear: Take the obscure, engineering-heavy work of space situational awareness and package it for the people writing checks.
Plain English Meets Orbital Debris
Satcat Terminal builds on a free platform Kayhan released publicly in mid-2024. That underlying catalog—dubbed simply "Satcat"—tracks more than 36,000 objects circling Earth, from active payloads to high-risk debris fragments. The Terminal layer, which launched March 20, adds conversational queries, live conjunction alerts, and customizable dashboards.
Users can monitor close approaches, visualize satellite footprints over specific geographies, or track space weather—all through interfaces designed for people who wouldn't know a Keplerian element if it hit them. "It's explicitly built for users without a background in orbital mechanics," Hyun Kyu Seo, Kayhan's Chief Product Officer, told Payload. That's a narrower audience than it sounds: insurance underwriters trying to price risk on a new constellation, investors sizing up a satellite operator's collision exposure, journalists chasing a story about orbital congestion.
The platform claims to refresh trajectories daily across 11,000 satellites. Whether that's enough granularity for serious financial analysis—or just enough to be dangerous—remains an open question.
The Market Nobody Knew They Needed

Who, exactly, needs real-time orbital intelligence if they're not running a satellite network themselves?
More people than you'd think, apparently. The satellite insurance sector has taken a beating—industry observers noted mounting losses across the underwriting market last fall—and insurers are hunting for better tools to assess orbital risk before they sign policies. Equity analysts covering the space economy want visibility into constellation health. Even journalists covering launches or space policy increasingly need data that doesn't require an engineering translator.
Seradata, a long-established database, serves the insurance side of the industry. But its strength is historical: launch reliability, past claims, hardware lineage. It wasn't built for real-time conjunction analysis or dynamic orbital monitoring. Kayhan is wagering there's a gap between financial databases and the heavy-duty space situational awareness platforms like LeoLabs or COMSPOC that serve actual operators.
Perhaps. Or perhaps the market is smaller than the company hopes. Enterprise space intelligence tools have a habit of looking essential until you try to price them.
Government Credentials, Commercial Ambitions

Kayhan has some credibility to lean on. The company holds contracts with the U.S. Space Force, NASA, NOAA, and DARPA. It participates in the Office of Space Commerce's Traffic Coordination System for Space—both as a Data Quality Monitor and through the COLA Gap Pathfinder initiative. Fast Company recognized Satcat's design in its 2025 Innovation by Design Awards, which counts for something in a field where user experience often runs a distant second to technical capability.
The company claims its broader coordination platform now covers more than 90% of operational low Earth orbit satellites across more than 50 operator customers. Kayhan positions this as "the largest commercial space traffic coordination platform," though that characterization comes from Kayhan itself, and the definition of "largest" in this context isn't entirely clear.
Still, the user numbers suggest some traction. The free public catalog drew 2,000 users in its first month after launching in June 2024. By this March, the platform displayed a live counter showing more than 72,000 searchable objects—a figure that shifts as new satellites launch and debris gets cataloged.
What It Costs (If You Have to Ask...)
Kayhan hasn't disclosed pricing for Satcat Terminal. The product appears as a gated enterprise offering, separate from the free research catalog, but details on subscription tiers, seat licensing, or contract structure remain unannounced.
That's standard practice for enterprise space intelligence tools. Slingshot Aerospace offers free access to some features of its Beacon platform to seed adoption. COMSPOC's SSASuite goes straight for bespoke contracts with operations centers. Pricing in this world tends to be negotiated case by case, based on use case and data access needs—which is a polite way of saying "whatever the market will bear."
A Bet on Broadening the Tent

Kayhan was founded in 2019 and has raised roughly $11 million across a pre-seed round and two seed extensions. Investors include Space Capital, Root Ventures, and Initialized Capital—respectable backers, though not the kind of war chest that buys market dominance in a field still figuring out its business models.
The company has been busy. Over the past year, it added a Business Directory, a Maneuver Planner, and a free GPU-accelerated propagation tool called sgp4.gl. Satcat Terminal represents the most direct play yet for revenue beyond satellite operators themselves.
Whether the "Bloomberg for space" framing sticks will come down to adoption. Financial professionals are ruthlessly pragmatic about software: A tool is indispensable until it isn't. If Kayhan can convince insurers and investors that orbital intelligence is as fundamental as bond data, the comparison might hold. If not, it risks becoming another promising space tech tool searching for a business model willing to pay enterprise prices.
For now, the platform is live. The pitch is clear. What remains to be seen is whether the people who need orbital data but never learned orbital mechanics will pay to skip the learning curve—or just keep calling the engineers.
